Name | Organization | Title |
---|---|---|
Dr. Kevin Schneider | ADTRAN | CTO (retired) |
Barbara Stark | AT&T | Lead Member of Technical Staff (retired) |
Richard Bennett | Consultant and Founder | High Tech Forum |
Greg White | CableLabs | Distinguished Technologist |
Dave Farber | Keio Univeristy | Distinguished Career Professor |
Amie Elcan | Lumen | Principal Architect - Data Strategies |
David Winner | Charter | Principal Engineer, Data Network and Transport Core |
Jason Livingood | Comcast | Vice President, Internet Services |
TBD | DISH | Senior Engineering Program Manager |
William Check | NCTA | SVP Science and Technology, CTO |
Mathew Tooley | NCTA | Vice President of Broadband Technology |
Nick Feamster | U of Chicago | Professor of Computer Science; BITAG Community Representative Engineer |
Dale Hatfield | University of Colorado | Adjunct Professor |
Matt Larsen | Vistabeam | Owner |
Industry Tier (revenue) |
Member |
Non-Member |
Above $5B |
No Cost |
$30,000 |
$1B to $5B |
No Cost |
$15,000 |
$100M to $1B |
No Cost |
$13,500 |
Under $100M |
No Cost |
$12,000 |
Trade Association Tier (budget) |
Member |
Non-Member |
Any Size Budget |
$25,000 |
$30,000 |
Community Representative Tier (budget) |
Member |
Non-Member |
Any Size budget |
No Cost |
$5,000 |
Individual Tier |
Member |
Non-member |
Any Individual |
No Cost |
$5,000 |
BITAG accepts requests for technical review of broadband network management practices or other related technical issues. To help answer questions about how to submit technical Review Requests to the TWG and how the process works, the following information addresses questions you may have regarding the TWG Review Request filing process. Of course, if the information here does not specifically address your questions, please feel free to contact us.
There are three ways that a technical issue may be brought before the TWG:
Anyone with questions concerning a broadband network management practice or other related technical issue may submit a request to the TWG in order to have it reviewed. You do not have to be a member of BITAG to submit a Review Request, although members do receive a discount on the required filing fee. Just to be clear, simply submitting a Request does not mean it will automatically be taken up by the TWG. The request must be approved and submitted with the appropriate filing fee.
The form and its instructions can be found here: Technical Working Group (TWG) Review Request Form & Instructions.
The Review Request form must be filled out in its entirety in order for your Review Request to be reviewed. We will need such things as:
Then simply email the completed and signed application (along with any additional technical documentation) back to BITAG at reviewrequest@bitag.org.
Review Requests will not be considered complete nor considered for review until we receive the requisite filing fee. There is an administrative and operational burden to each review and the filing fee covers a portion of the cost of these reviews. If your Review Request is not accepted, BITAG will provide a full refund. The filing fee can be waived by the Executive Director for economic hardship or other reasons.
Filing fees vary based on whether you are member of the BITAG, your company's annual revenues, and some other factors. The filing fee schedule is:
Industry Tier (revenue) |
Member |
Non-Member |
Above $5B | No Cost | $30,000 |
$1B to $5B | No Cost | $15,000 |
$100M to $1B | No Cost | $13,500 |
Under $100M | No Cost | $12,000 |
Trade Assoc. Tier (budget) |
||
Any Size | $25,000 | $30,000 |
Comm. Rep. Tier (budget) |
||
Any Size | No Cost | $5,000 |
Individual Tier |
||
Any Individual | No Cost | $5,000 |
Please contact reviewrequest@bitag.org about submitting your filing fee payment.
Once we receive a fully completed Review Request along with the appropriate filing fee, the following will occur:
Once the Review Request is approved, BITAG will begin the internal processes necessary for the Technical Working Group to start its deliberations.
» Frequently asked questions regarding BITAG and the Techincal Working Group
Frequently Asked Questions about BITAG and the TWG.
BITAG's Technical Working Group (or "TWG" for short) is where the core substantive technical work of BITAG takes place. Whenever BITAG takes up a technical issue, the issue is reviewed by the TWG, which will analyze the issue and then publish a report that describes the technical analysis. The TWG was formed with the following principles in mind: technically driven, open, balanced, transparent, efficient, independent and flexible.
The ultimate goal of BITAG is to get engineers and other technical experts together in "problem solving mode" and provide the best technical information and counsel to policymakers and the public – and stay focused on engineering, not politics. The role of BITAG is also to bring a broader-based sensitivity than that of the typical standards setting body. Often standards setting committees will develop technical proposals without being aware of the unintended consequences that may be felt by the rest of the Internet ecosystem, whereas BITAG can help to provide a broader viewpoint of how these technical issues affect the various stakeholders.
BITAG's stated mission is to bring together engineers and technical experts to develop consensus on broadband network management practices and related technical issues that can affect users' Internet experience – including the impact to and from applications, content, and devices. Specifically, this can include:
BITAG's TWG fulfills its mission through analyzing technical issues and generating reports that detail that analysis. The reports will be published on our website, and freely available to policymakers and the public alike to use as they see fit.
The TWG generally operates under a 120-day "Shot Clock" (as described in the TWG Governance Manual), meaning that from the time that a committee is fully formed and all of the TWG Reps have joined it, there is 120-days in which to analyze the technical issue and generate a report. The period can be extended by up to 30-days for good cause, but this is the exception and not the rule.
Network management and other technical issues that may affect users' experience on the Internet, including the impact to and from applications, content, and devices.
Each TWG Representative must demonstrate the requisite technical network management expertise through either education or experience. For more information, please see Sec. 7.3 of BITAG's Bylaws and our list of current TWG Representatives.
Either you or your employing organization will need to submit an application, along with either your or the proposed TWG Representative's resume or CV. Please see our membership page for more information and our membership application.
BITAG's Technical Working Group (TWG) can receive technical issues from a few different sources:
The TWG uses a number of "filters" when deciding which technical topics may be appropriate to take up on its own initiative.
These filters can include:
A Review Request is where someone (either a Member or a non-Member) brings a network management or other technical issue to BITAG in order for the Technical Working Group (TWG) to analyze it and generate a report. The Review Request must outline the technical issue with sufficient clarity for the TWG to begin its analysis, and among other things be accompanied by the requisite filing fee.
For your convenience, please use the Technical Review Request Form.
For each Review Request sent to BITAG there is a significant operational and administrative burden. BITAG asks those who submit requests to shoulder a small portion of that burden through payment of a filing fee. This fee is refundable if the Review Request is rejected. The filing fee schedule is:
Industry Tier (revenue) |
Member |
Non-Member |
|
Above $5B | No Cost | $30,000 | |
$1B to $5B | No Cost | $15,000 | |
$100M to $1B | No Cost | $13,500 | |
Under $100M | No Cost | $12,000 | |
Trade Assoc. Tier (budget) |
|||
Any Size | $25,000 | $30,000 | |
Comm. Rep. Tier (budget) |
|||
Any Size | No Cost | $5,000 | |
Individual Tier |
|||
Any Individual | No Cost | $5,000 |
No, individuals are welcome to join BITAG. Please note though that if you are already employed by an organization that either is already a member or will soon be a member, then you will be considered to be joining on behalf of that organization, and your Membership Dues and Member Category will be based on your employing organization's information.
No, you or your organization can be either a Participating Member or an Observing Member. Observing Members' dues are half that of Participating Members, but an Observing Member has significantly less rights than a Participating Member, and of course generally cannot participate in the generation of a BITAG Report.
To be a Member of BITAG, an individual or organization must pay the annual membership dues. Dues are based upon the type of organization and size of revenues.
Annual Revenue |
Participating Dues |
Observing Dues |
|
Over $5 Billion | $50,000 | $25,000 | |
$1 Billion - $5 Billion | $25,000 | $12,500 | |
$100 Million - $1 Billion | $20,000 | $10,000 | |
Under $100 Million | $10,000 | $5,000 |
Annual Budget |
Participating Dues |
Observing Dues |
|
Over $3 Million | $2,500 | $1,250 | |
$1 Million to $3 Million | $1,500 | $750 | |
Under $1 Million | $500 | $250 | |
Individual | $125 | $65 |
Annual Budget |
Observing Dues |
||
Over $50 Million | $30,000 | ||
$25 Million - $50 Million | $25,000 | ||
$1 Million - $25 Million | $20,000 | ||
Under $1 Million | $10,000 |
BITAG welcomes suggestions for technical topics for its Technical Working Group (TWG) to analyze and generate reports on. Please feel free to email us your technical suggestions at suggestions@bitag.org.
BITAG staff will review these suggestions and bring any suggestions that raise a technical issue that falls within BITAG's mission to the Technical Working Group (TWG). The TWG will evaluate technical issues that fall within the scope of the mission and it may choose to review any suggested issues on its own initiative. We would encourage you to review BITAG's mission (www.bitag.org) and the type of information that is required to be submitted in a formal review request in formulating your suggestion. To be clear, the TWG is not obligated to review any suggestion and it is within its sole discretion on whether to review any or all of the issues raised in a submitted suggestion. If you would like to submit a formal review request, you can do so by following the instructions in the Review Request Application.
Otherwise, BITAG looks forward to your suggested technical topics. Again, to be emailed to BITAG at: suggestions@bitag.org.
By submitting a suggestion, you consent to and understand that BITAG may use the you information submitted, including personal information, in accordance with the terms of its Privacy Policy.